This page is part of the E3G Public Bank Climate Tracker Matrix, our tool to help you assess the Paris alignment of public banks, MDBs and DFIs.
|Promotion of green finance||Paris-aligned – ADB is helping to drive green bond markets through its own issuance and its support of other issuers. It is less clear to what extent ADB is working with regulators on green finance.|
|Fossil to non-fossil energy finance ratio and scaling up climate finance||Unaligned – for every $1 the Asian Development Bank provided to fossil fuels, $0.7 went to renewables and $0.6 went to energy networks (transmission and distribution) between 2016-2018.|
|Nature based solutions||Paris aligned – ADB’s nature based solution frameworks are aligned with the Paris Agreement.|
|Climate risk, resilience, and adaptation||Paris aligned – dedicated strategy for climate risk at project level. Climate strategy takes beyond-project approach to client resilience.|
|Overarching climate strategy||Some progress – ADB strategic framework is relatively advanced. The climate strategy is comprehensive and addresses mitigation and adaptation. The overarching strategy refers to the Joint MDB Paris Alignment process and elaborates how ADB could implement this. The do-no-harm principle is missing in both strategies.|
|Integration of climate mitigation and resilience in key sectoral strategies||Some progress – A majority of sectoral policies are Paris aligned and ADB has integrated the climate strategy into sectoral frameworks. However, key policies such as energy and resilient transport are not aligned yet.|
|Institutional leadership||Paris aligned – ADB has established good practice in several areas including portfolio emissions commitments, ocean health and transparency.|
|Energy access and fuel poverty||Some progress – The ADB Energy Policy prioritises modern energy access and sets a specific target, but implementation and progress updates are lacking.|
|Energy efficiency strategy, standards and investment||Some progress – the importance of energy efficiency is recognised but this needs operationalising.|
|Fossil fuel exclusion policies||Some progress – Oil and gas exploration is excluded; there is no official coal exclusion policy.|
|Greenhouse gas accounting and reduction||Some progress – the ADB undertakes GHG accounting for the whole portfolio but no target set for GHG emissions to peak.|
|Shadow carbon pricing||Some progress – Carbon price is close to High Level Commission on Carbon Pricing minimum. Emission threshold could be improved, and Scope 3 emissions are not included.|
|Country level work||Some progress – Country Partnership Strategies include both adaptation and mitigation, as well as integration of NDC goals, but doesn’t raise ambition in line with 1.5C or 2C target.|
|Technical assistance for implementing Paris goals||Some progress – ADB is working to support implementation of Paris goals through the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) Advance Platform. However, it is also providing technical assistance in support of fossil fuels.|
|Transparency of climate finance data||Some progress – Transparency of climate finance data is very good but financial intermediary lending needs improving.|
- The Asian Development Bank should use the forthcoming energy policy review to set a target date for 100% of its energy lending to be to zero carbon energy projects, phasing out support for unabated fossil-related projects.
- ADB needs to make energy efficiency an infrastructure priority and should consider setting a specific energy efficiency lending target, which excludes energy efficiency improvements of fossil fuel infrastructure.
- ADB should ramp up its technical assistance to financial regulators in Asia to promote green national financing strategies for mitigation and adaptation.
ADB was the first MDB to set a target date to peak portfolio GHG emissions which is “2030 at the latest”. The Bank recognises that earlier peaking would be the “optimal course of action”. Other development banks, including the World Bank Group, should follow ADB’s lead on this.